|
課程名稱 |
文明與國際政治專題
Seminar on the Civilizational Knowledge of International Relationas |
|
開課學期 |
110-1 |
|
授課對象 |
社會科學院 政治學研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
石之瑜 |
|
課號 |
PS7606 |
|
課程識別碼 |
322 M5260 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
3.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期五5,6,7(12:20~15:10) |
|
上課地點 |
社科研605 |
|
備註 |
國際關係，政治思想。
限碩士班以上
總人數上限：35人
外系人數限制：10人 |
|
|
|
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
We will critically reflect upon theorizing of international relations from a variety of cosmological perspectives. |
|
課程目標 |
09/24 關係系統的擴張與共存
10/01 Pluriversalism
(1) Kurki, Milja (2021). Relational revolution and relationality in IR: New conversations. Review of International Studies, 1-16. doi:10.1017/S0260210521000127
(2) Berenskötter, Felix. (2018). Deep theorizing in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 24, 4: 814-840
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1354066117739096
(3) Hutchings, Kimberly (2019). Decolonizing Global Ethics: Thinking with the Pluriverse. Ethics & International Affairs, 33(2), 115-125. doi:10.1017/S0892679419000169
10/08 Relational International Relations
(1) Tamara A Trownsell, Arlene B Tickner, Amaya Querejazu, Jarrad Reddekop, Giorgio Shani, Kosuke Shimizu, Navnita Chadha Behera, Anahita Arian, Differing about Difference: Relational IR from around the World, International Studies Perspectives, Volume 22, Issue 1, February 2021, Pages 25–64, https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekaa008
(2) Arlene B Tickner, Amaya Querejazu, Weaving Worlds: Cosmopraxis as Relational Sensibility, International Studies Review, Volume 23, Issue 2, June 2021, Pages 391–408, https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa100
(3) Pratt, Simon Frankel. (2019). From Norms to Normative Configurations: A Pragmatist and Relational Approach to Theorizing Normativity in IR. International Theory 12(1), 59–82.doi:10.1017/S1752971919000095
10/15 Assimilation into Liberal Order
(1) Shih, Chih-yu. 2010. “The West That Is Not in the West: Identifying Self in Oriental Modernity.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 23: 537-560; https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2010.523823
(2) Shih, Chih-yu and Chih-yun Chang. 2017. “The Rise of China Between Cultural and Civilizational Relationalities: Lessons from Four Qing Cases,” International Journal of Asian Studies 14, 1: 1-25; doi:10.1017/S1479591416000231
(3) Neumann, Iver. 2011. “Entry into International Society Reconceptualized: The Case of Russia.” Review of International Studies 37(2): 463–84. 10.1017/S0260210510000756
10/22 Confucian International Relations
(1) Qin, Yaqing & Astrid H. M. Nordin (2019) Relationality and rationality in Confucian and Western traditions of thought, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32:5, 601-614, DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2019.1641470
(2) Shih, Chih-yu. (2020). Friendship in Chinese International Relations: The Confucian Theme of Distance in Practice. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 53(4), 177-199. https://doi.org/10.1525/j.postcomstud.2020.53.4.177
(3) Raoul Bunskoek and Chih-yu Shih, (2021) “‘Community of Common Destiny’ as Post-Western Regionalism: Rethinking China’s Belt and Road Initiative from a Confucian Perspective”, Uluslararasi Iliskiler, DOI: 10.33458/uidergisi.954744
10/29 Daoism and International Relations
(1) Ling, Lily H. M. (2013). Worlds beyond Westphalia: Daoist dialectics and the ‘China threat’. Review of International Studies, 39(3), 549-568. doi:10.1017/S026021051200054X
(2) Zhao, Tingyang. (2009). A Political World Philosophy in Terms of All-under-heaven. Diogenes 56(1), 4-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192109102149
(3) Shannon Brincat & L. H. M. Ling (2014) Dialectics for IR: Hegel and the Dao, Globalizations, 11:5, 661-687, DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2014.940246
11/05 Buddhism and International Relations
(1) Kosuke Shimizu, “Buddhism and the Question of Relationality in International Relations”, Uluslararasi Iliskiler, DOI: 10.33458/uidergisi.954738
(2) Shih, Chih-yu. 2017. Transcending Hegemonic International Relations Theorization: Nothingness, Re-Worlding, and Balance of Relationship, All Azimuth 6, 2: 19-24. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.310126
(3) Kosuke Shimizu & Sei Noro (2020) An East Asian approach to temporality, subjectivity and ethics: bringing Mahāyāna Buddhist ontological ethics of Nikon into international relations, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2020.1859463
11/12 期中考週電影欣賞Red Moon
11/19 Ubuntu, Sufism and Quichua
(1) Dikeledi Madise, Christopher Isike, Ubuntu Diplomacy: Broadening Soft Power in an African Context. Public Affairs 20(3) https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2097
(2) Shahi, Deepshikha. 2020. Introducing Sufism to International Relations Theory: A Preliminary Inquiry into Epistemological, Ontological, and Methodological pathwaysEuropean Journal of International Relations 25(1): 250-275 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1354066117751592
(3) Swanson,Tod D., Jarrad Reddekop (2017). Looking Like the Land: Beauty and Aesthetics in Amazonian Quichua Philosophy and Practice, Journal of the American Academy of Religion 85(3): 682–708, https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfw086
11/26 Hinduism and International Relations
Shahi, Deepshikha (2019) Kautilya Reincarnated: Steering Arthaśāstra Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Relations. In: Kautilya and Non-Western IR Theory. Global Political Thinkers. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01728-6_4
(2) Gautam, Pradeep Kumar. (2019). Dharma: The Moral Aspects of Statecraft. UNISCI Journal 49 (Enero/January) http://www.unisci.es/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/UNISCIDP49-2PRADEEP-1.pdf
(3) Pool, Fernande W. (2020). Development Within a Religious Ontology? The Argument from Islamic Dharma. European Journal of Development Research Res 32, 1038–1056. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-019-00252-0
12/03 Racism and IR Theorizing
(1) Ling, Lily H. M. (2017). The missing Other: A review of Linklater’s Violence and Civilization in the Western States-System. Review of International Studies, 43(4), 621-636. doi:10.1017/S0260210517000225
(2) Howell, Alison and Melanie Richter-Montpetit. 2020. Is securitization theory racist? Civilizationism, methodological whiteness, and antiblack thought in the Copenhagen School. Security Dialogue 51(1): 3-22 https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010619862921
(3) Lynch, Cecelia (2019). The Moral Aporia of Race in International Relations. International Relations. 33(2): 267-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117819842275
12/10 請參加（暫訂）新書發表會3:30--5:30
12/17 De-colonialism and IR Theorizing
(1) Ling, Lily H. M. (2019) Three-ness: Healing World Politics with Epistemic Compassion 39(1): 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395718783351
(2) Ticker, Arlene B. and Amaya Querejazu. (2021). Weaving Worlds: Cosmopraxis as Relational Sensibility. International Studies Review 23(2): 391-408. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa100
(3) Shih, Chih-yu (2021). Engendering international relations of Shanghai: the metaphor of cheongsam and the construction of post-Western identities. International Politics (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00274-0
12/24 Critical Self-/reflections
01/07 個別指導與閱讀
01/14 個別指導與閱讀
01/21 個別指導與閱讀 |
|
課程要求 |
課堂要求：事先閱讀教材；參與課堂討論；課堂摘要4篇；團隊報告1次 |
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
另約時間 備註： 會談時間：事前約定 |
|
指定閱讀 |
如上列 |
|
參考書目 |
如課綱所示 |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
|
1. |
成績 |
100% |
評分標準：課堂報告25%；參與討論25%；期末書評50% |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1-18週 |
09/24-01/21 |
請參考課程內容頁面 |
|